Having read what I think might be a fair amount of Pat
Barker’s work in the past (hell, I’ve even blogged about her already), I was
pretty sure of what I was getting myself into with Another World. Aside from
the fact that is caused Asleep by The
Smiths to get stuck in my head something chronic, it was pretty much what I
expected. Although it’s set in
modern(ish) times, it is mostly about World War One. This time, though, Barker’s focusing on
memories and interpretations rather than the events themselves. Added to this there’s a pseudo-horror-ghost
story thing that I was hoping would be utterly appropriate in the run up to
Hallowe’en. (I am well aware that this
ship has now sailed, and at this point would like to reiterate my holiday).
The World War One stuff’s difficult to argue with
really. Geordie is a 101 year-old
veteran slowly dying. Fairly
appropriately, the closer he gets to death, the more the war spills out of
him. It’s not that he has a burning
desire to confess while there’s still time, quite the opposite actually, but
the memories that used to haunt him return at night. Barker slips in odd lines to the prose itself
that paraphrase the war poets, Wilfred Owen especially- Geordie’s last words
are, “I am in Hell”- echoing Owen’s Strange Meeting (“By his dead smile I knew
we stood in Hell”). Sorry, there’s a
spoiler there. The 101 year-old
dies. I want to say that there’s also an
element of Barker Peggy-Sue-ing her way into the book in the form of Geordie’s
main confessor Helen. She is an Oxford
scholar who used his experience in her dissertation. I’m not sure if Barker did actually have
conversations like those between Helen and Geordie but I feel like she’s
challenging the reader to assume she did only to remind us it’s only a book.
This unease is caused by the ghost portion of the book. Another
World actually focuses on Nick and the amalgamation of his and his
(relatively) new wife’s families and children.
One night when redecorating the family discover a portrait of the
house’s original owners, the Fanshawes.
It’s sufficient to say not only is it a creepy-as-hell scrawled on the
wall affair but also the Fanshawe family mirrors Nick’s own. Naturally, a bit of digging reveals a
murdered Fanshawe son, fallen foul of fratricide. At this point things don’t look too good for
the infant Jasper, especially as his half-brother seems adamant on taking out
his violent tendencies on him.
Half-sister Miranda also appears to be playing just as much of an
ambiguous role in it all as her historical counterpart, who may or may not be
haunting the modern family. And then,
right on the last page, Barker goes and writes, “It’s easy to let oneself be
dazzled by false analogies- the past never threatens anything as simple, or
avoidable, as repetition.” Because, of
course, Nick’s family are not the Fanshawes.
As much as I feel like I’m having the rug pulled out from
under my feet at the end, I like the book.
Barker has a talent for writing short books that leave you wanting more-
not as an epilogue to her stories, which are complete, but throughout the
stories themselves. She is a minimalist,
but I want more. More of the illusion
that the Fanshawes and the Halfords, more worrying about Jasper’s fate, more
stories about children killing one another.
So close to Hallowe’en especially, I want a clearer cut ghost.
I've just finished the last of my holiday reads (it was
only a few days away), Anna Karenina. Expect a new blog soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment