I don’t have that much personal experience of divorce. No-one in my family’s really done it- aside
from one second cousin (or similarly obscure relative). And Steph’s divorce dissolved into a sitcom
like farce of not letting my great grandmother find out. It was fun when I was ten, but I’ve never
quite figured out why it was necessary.
I’ve since found out that my great grandmother was divorced herself, and
at a time when it was actually a bit scandalous. Anyway, the point is that my main frame of reference
for the effects of divorce on the children is anecdotes from friends and
Jacqueline Wilson books. And Jaqueline
Wilson wrote about it far better than Henry James.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86697/8669768b3751419475b17bea024dcc0bcf86d4ff" alt=""
I’m not sure if it’s a problem that I have with the way
James writes. I love gothic horror, but The Turn of the Screw bored me half to
tears. I had the same issue with What Maisie Knew- it’s difficult to
write about a book that I couldn’t connect with in any meaningful way. There are bits in it that I know,
objectively, are funny but they didn’t hit the mark. For example, Maisie’s stepmother describes
her father as a man who changes in everything every three days, but is
completely consistent in the amount he hates her mother. Usually, I love people being pithy and
scathing. It’s one of my favourite things. And I don’t know why I don’t love it when
James does it. It’s infuriating. Maybe I just overtaxed myself with the recent
travelling and reading binge I went on.
Fingers crossed that I can get back into the groove for my next read…
I’ve just started Flann O’Brien’s At Swim-Two-Birds. I’m not quite sure yet why it needs so many
hyphens.
No comments:
Post a Comment