I find myself in the awkward position again of having no
idea how to start my blog. I’m not sure
what I want to say about Oscar and
Lucinda. I enjoyed parts of it and
parts of it I knew, objectively, while reading them were good. But reading isn’t an objective thing and I
found it so difficult to connect with or care about. At times it felt like watching an episode of Who Do You Think You Are? starring a
celebrity I’d never heard of. It’s a
story about another family’s unbelievable family legends and their gambling
problems.
I went into this book knowing nothing about it that I hadn’t
read in the blurb. The blurb promises a story
of an heiress and a vicar who love each other but can’t be together. Also they both gamble. I had no idea that Peter Carey is Australian
so went into the thing expecting swooning maidens and meaningful gazes across a
game of bridge; all the while making sure local gossip Mrs Miggins doesn’t
catch wind of the mutual longing. I
thought there would be talk of Oscar being below Lucinda’s station. Turns out, Australia didn’t really go in for
all that shit; it’s set in the 1880s and the pair end up living together while
unmarried. Lucinda gives precisely zero
fucks about the gossip this causes. And
as much as I want to like her, I can’t.
I spent most of the book feeling utterly disconnected from everything
that happens in Australia.
The story’s told from the point of view of one of Oscar’s
descendants. The narrator turns Oscar
into a thing of legend. It’s told like a
tale that’s been passed down through the generations. Or it sort of is. The narrator’s simultaneously omnipotent and
a character involved in the tale. He
knows things that it’s impossible to know and so when he occasionally refers to
Oscar as “my great-great-grandfather,” it’s jarring. It takes you out of the story because the
book is neither one thing nor another.
We get to know Oscar too well for him to be a real thing of legend.
I get what Carey’s doing through most of the book. It’s about chance. The whole plot hinges on gambling multiple
times. Oscar only leaves England for
Australia because of the flip of a coin and he leaves Lucinda on a fool’s
bet. She bets him, in a plot development
that sounds like one of those drunken bets Dave Gorman used to take, that he
can’t transport a glass church 400 km along the Australian coast. Naturally, Oscar takes this bet because he is
an addict. This I accept. It’s mostly the concept of a glass church
that I take umbrage with. It’s-well-
stupid. It detracts from the rest of the
book because of its ridiculousness.
Oscar and Lucinda
isn’t a bad book. I think all my
problems with it come down, again, to my expectations of the novel verses the
reality of the book. I know that I’ve
said time and time again that the trick to really enjoying a book is to go in
without any expectations. I’m just
beginning to think that this can only be achieved by not even reading the
blurb…
My read is Jeanette Winterson’s The Passion. I haven’t read
anything by her for years, so I’m looking getting back into her.
No comments:
Post a Comment