No-one does introspective angst quite like the French. That may sound xenophobic or like a lazy
stereotype; but it’s true and I think I can prove it. I’m going to veer away from standard form for
the next couple of blogs, if only because I’ve read two List Books in a row by
the same author (blame Vintage Classics and their decision to combine two
novellas into one book). This time it’s Things: A Story of the Sixties, by
Georges Perec and, although my next read is also him I am going to deal with
the two stories separately.
Things (to remove
the post-hoc subtitle) is a pretty important book, according to its
introduction, at least. It’s the first
novel of French writer Perec, who would go on to write other List featured gems
such as the wonderfully titled Life: A
User’s Manual and famed novel-without-the-letter-e, Avoid/ A Void. The latter of
these I find particularly impressive, as considering the French for “I” this
wipes out the ability write in the first person almost entirely. But back to Things; it’s more than just a prize winning novel that launched the
career of an important writer. It’s also
the kind of book that captures a 1960s Parisian zeitgeist perfectly. And it’s bloody good too.
The book itself reminds me strongly of the French New Wave
of cinema. Being written in the Sixties,
it would have been at around the same time that Jean-Luc Godard and François
Truffaut were really in the swing of ridding French cinema of its certain tendencies
and portraying reality. According the
story is fairly simple. Couple Jérôme
and Sylvie are two young market researchers who are in pursuit of something
better in Paris. Their lives revolve
around cigarettes, nights out with friends and possessions, while they lament
the fact that they have no money. Eventually,
they give up France for Sfax in Tunisia, but this does not last either and they
soon return. The novella finishes with a
pessimistic epilogue of a cookie-cutter future for the pair that drips with
inevitability.
Jérôme and Sylvie themselves are pretty incidental. They are characters moved by outside events
rather than ones that have any discernible effect on the plot. The epilogue shows this; their lives are
mapped out for them, no matter what their actual desires may be. Perec also has a wonderful tendency to focus
on their things, rather than the couple.
They are not introduced by name until around the third chapter, long
after their possessions and one of the stand-out bits of the book is a section
about their apartment before they move out, finally empty of their clutter and
once again desirable. Perec gives the
feeling that Jérôme and Sylvie are transitory and the only things with permanence
are just that: things.
Part of the reason that Things
has really struck a chord with me is that I am at the same point in my life as Jérôme
and Sylvie and I can see my life going the same way. I’m not sure how, but I appear to have fallen
into something that could well be described as a career and that maps out paths
for me that Perec seems to be suggesting I will end up taking, no matter my
view on the thing. In Things, Perec doesn’t suggest anything
as trite as fate takes over, he just understands how the majority of lives run
and although there are subtle (and not so subtle) differences between Paris of
the 1960s and Norwich of the 2010s, the general course of a human life hasn’t
changed terribly. And Perec is
predicting a mediocre future.
Join me next time for the introspection of Georges Perec
part deux: A Man Asleep.
No comments:
Post a Comment