Legend isn’t the
kind of book that I’d normally go for. It’s
that kind of fantasy tale that I tend to associate with forty year old men who
still live in their mother’s basements and spend their time abusing women on computer
games. Anyway, as none of the kind of
books I’d normally go for have helped, I thought I’d give the kind I can’t
stand a go to reinvigorate my love of reading.
And it kind of worked. David
Gemmell’s book isn’t great. In fact,
it’s downright stupid in places, but I wanted to finish reading it. And I wanted to write about it.
The book tells the story of Druss, the legend of the
title. He is an aged warrior preparing
for his final battle, one that he knows cannot be won. It’s a story told from varying perspectives
and there’s nothing wrong with it, as such.
Once the battle gets going it actually ends up being quite good and given
that the battle is roughly half of the book that’s saying something. Inevitably, Druss dies. There’s some nonsense about a prophecy and some
kind of battle rage known as baresark which isn’t really developed. Given that this is the first book in a
series, I can forgive that, even if I didn’t particularly enjoy those bits of
it.
Druss is sort of an interesting character. He is respected and beloved by everyone; even
his enemies acknowledge his greatness. He
has a meeting with the leader of the opposing forces before his death. People are fascinated by him. He is so famous that he is able to kill on
his reputation alone. At one point he
mentions that most of the fights in his dotage were won because his opponents
believed that they could not beat him. There
are parts of the book that really remind me of Blonde. It’s a tale about a
legend that simultaneously perpetuates the legend.
There are bits of this book that I simply could not
stand. The biggest offender is the
romantic subplot. Early on, solider Rek
meets Virae. She hates him. Really properly loathes him and it’s made
worse by the fact that he saves her life.
Anyway; she hates him. And then,
about twenty pages later they are madly in love. It’s unbelievable and stupid and it’s just
badly written. It reads like it’s
written by a man who has never spoken to a woman, much less cared for one. There are lines in their subplot that read
like they come from the cheesiest, most heavy handed love story out there, “’I
love you,’ he said. A dolphin surfaced
below them, calling out a musical welcome before again seeking the depths.” Lines like that are best left uncommented
upon.
So that’s it. A sort
of okay book that has some seriously low lows and some kind of alright highs
and some nice philosophising on the nature of war. Most importantly, the book did its trick and
I am looking forward to reading again so I think that Legend has done its job. Luckily, I don’t have to read any more of Gemmell’s
work. It’s not bad, it’s really
not. It just isn’t the best book ever
and while I enjoyed it well enough, I’m not certain what it’s doing on The
List.
I’m now on to Fools of
Fortune by William Trevor.
No comments:
Post a Comment