I think I’ve said it before, but Ian McEwan’s books tend to
fall into one of two tropes. Firstly,
there’s The Guardian reader gets into
a spot of bother type, this is contrasted by the semi-anonymous protagonist
gets into significantly more trouble but essentially the plot goes nowhere type. Also there’s Atonement. The Cement Garden falls into the second
category and it’s a solid Ian McEwan book.
I don’t think I’ve ever read anything of his that I’ve truly loved or
hated. He’s good and he’s consistent. That’s really all I’ve ever had to say about
him.
The Cement Garden
is the story of four children who become orphans shortly before the school
summer holidays. For a book concerned
with their orphanhood, it takes a bloody long time for their mother to die. Their father snuffs it rather quickly some
years before while our narrator, Jack, is busy masturbating in the
bathroom. He achieves orgasm for the
first time just as his father is dying in the garden, tying up a “becoming the
man of the house” metaphor so neatly there may as well be a bow on it. Anyway, once both parents have shuffled off
this mortal coil, the kids hide the corpse as part of a pact to remain
together. Jack and his older sister
Julie take on the role of mother and father and then incest ensues. Nothing else happens.
I’m not being fair to the book. Julie and Jack were toeing the incest line
long before their parents died. It’s one
of the things that makes me assume this book was based largely on McEwan’s time
at the University of East Anglia.
Norfolk is well known as the incest region of the British Isles and
apparently (at least, according to the guy who sits next to me at work) there
have been proper studies done that do actually show Norfolk has higher rates of
incest than anywhere else in the country.
Combine this with an unnatural love of concrete and the only logical
conclusion is UEA. For those of you
unfamiliar with the campus, I’ve included a visual aid.
The problem with the book is that it doesn’t show the
descent into depravity and desperation that could come from being orphaned and
left without any adult supervision for the summer. The kids are already weird long before they
are orphans and so, rather than proper character development, the book seems to
just contain dissociated moments as Jack drifts through life. The only character from outside the family
isn’t exactly normal either. Julie’s
boyfriend is a much older “professional” snooker player. When he notices something’s up and the whole
house smells of corpse, the orphans tell him it’s a dead dog. He knows it’s their mum and rather than
calling the police, he just plays along getting increasingly more offended that
they won’t tell him the truth. The fact
that Derek just goes with it means there’s no contrast for what’s happening in
the orphans’ house.
I get that everything I’ve just said about The Cement Garden is negative. I didn’t hate this book, though. I just kind of nothinged it. It’s not a book that goes anywhere, but
McEwan is a good writer. Not very much
is happening but it’s a well written not very much. I think that’s what I’m trying to say. Even if I don’t like McEwan’s stories; I like
the man’s style. This is the last of his
books that I’ve come to on The List and it’s not the best of exits. If anything, it’s left me wishing that there
could be one more book of McEwan’s to go.
But I guess, ultimately, that’s what the revised and updated versions of
The List are for.
My next book is Michel Houllebecq’s Platform.
No comments:
Post a Comment