After a trip to London (and the request seven hours on
various and much delayed coaches) has coincided with a stack of very short
books I’m stuck playing catch up on the blog.
By the time you read this my trip to the capital will probably be a
month past. That’s what you get for
reading three books in one day. Anyway,
future trips will align with long books; kicking things off with a 77 page
novella was a mistake. Or maybe it
wasn’t. The Pigeon is short and super intense so it’s kind of ideal to read
in one sitting, the way I’ve been forced to read it. Add to that a creepy guy trying to take up
half of my seat and making me feel awkward as balls and you get a pretty much
perfect reading scenario for a story about a guy completely flipping his shit
over nothing.
The Pigeon it is
important to establish isn’t one for ornithologists. Anyone expecting some kind of urban Kes is in the wrong place. In fact, the bird itself appears in one
scene. The book’s more about the
consequences of the pigeon than an actual bird.
One day, well respected man Jonathan Noel is leaving his dingy rooms to
start another day of work just as he has for the thousands of days that
preceded it. But on this one day there
is a pigeon in his corridor. The pigeon
is essentially just the catalyst that causes Noel to question his brand of
living and so from this point on, he is on edge. Noel questions thirty carefully constructed
years of order over one event he cannot control. As the day wears on he is distracted at work,
tears a hole in his trousers and plans to never return to his room because the
pigeon has sullied it. It doesn’t sound
like much of a story, but Noel’s problems pile up so thick and fast that you
forget he’s obsessing over nothing.
I feel like I’m not saying that much about the book
itself. But that’s only because so
little really happens. Everything that
is of any interest in The Pigeon is down to Patrick Süskind’s marvellous
style. It’s strange to refer to a book
in which one of the main events is literally a man tearing a whole in his
trousers as unrelenting but it’s true. I
don’t remember the last time I cared about the fate of someone else’s trousers
so much. It’s a something that is going
to be lost in the retelling, so I don’t see the point in saying too much
more. Just go and read it.
Next up (and already read in full): Hideous Kinky by Esther
Freud. It too has a misleading title.
No comments:
Post a Comment